#773
4:32 pm, Thursday, April 12th, 2007Got my Bio 201 exam back today — 94%. Apparently, increasing fertility rates don’t contribute to demographic transition. Well, according to the correction noted for question #3, anyway. Doesn’t sound right to me, but there you go.
Lost has been more expository lately. I can’t believe Juliette’s boyfriend was the guy the tailies killed. No wonder she’s double-crossing Jack and the others. So, given that pregnant women almost always die on the island, I’m beginning to think that the black smoke is just the visible part of a huge network of nano-machines that keep people healthy. I think pregnancy might mess things up because the system can’t distinguish the fetus from a tumor. Or maybe the nano-things have specific orders to maintain the island’s population at a certain level. Eh, I dunno… none of that explains why it killed Eko or the pilot.
This whole Don Imus thing is pretty nuts. I guess part of it is that there’s very little news going on this week (his comments and the test results confirming the father of Anna Nicole’s baby are the only things going on, apparently). But I think it’s pretty stupid that he’s getting vilified and fired for a three-word off-the-cuff remark about a sports team when people like Michael Savage say way more bigoted things, with specific intent, on national broadcasts almost every day. Why doesn’t CNN get up in arms when Savage calls for Madeleine Albright to be hanged? Or when he says all gay people should get AIDS and die? Or that certain races have never contibuted anything to civilization? This stuff is far worse than anything anyone’s ever said about a college basketball team.
This Java game is pretty neat. You have to build 3-D objects from 2-D schematics. Which reminds me; I need to finish my SketchUp project. Blah. I’m going to go call some suppliers and arrange RMAs.
Update: Apparently the Java game is a little buggy; it doesn’t “green-circle” my solutions for figuur 3 and figuur 4, even though they conform to the 2-D views and use the given number of blocks. Oh well, it’s still a neat brain exercise.
Update 2: Okay, I figured out why #3 wasn’t showing up as correct. I had the model oriented wrong — the arrow has to point to the bottom when viewed from the top. Boy, number 10 was a doozy — took me a few tries. Here’s the solution, in case anyone’s stuck.